Legal Opinion

Watson v. Trinz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 6, 1934No. Gen. No. 36,491PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan

Clara D. Watson sued Marigold Garage Company, a corporation, Edward Trinz and his wife, Rosalie K. Trinz, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her. In a trial before a jury Marigold Garage Company was found not guilty and there was a verdict and judgment against Edward Trinz and Rosalie K. Trinz for $42,500. Edward Trinz and Rosalie K. Trinz sued out a writ of error to reverse the judgment, and thereafter we reversed the judgment and remanded the cause. (Watson v. Trinz, 262 Ill. App. 630 [Abst.].) Subsequently there was a second trial, and a jury returned a verdict finding…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gochee v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Potts v. . PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Sibley v. NasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Braxton v. . MendelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Densby v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Seyferlich v. MaxwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  2. Martino v. BarraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Louis v. YoungrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  4. Armster v. American Steel FoundriesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  5. Fulton v. YondorfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API