Legal Opinion
Specht v. Beindorf
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided November 3, 1898No. 8417PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Hopewell, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ragan, C.
Christian Specht, claiming to be an innocent purchaser before due of a..promissory note executed by one George E. Timme to W. R. Yaughan, brought suit thereon in the district court of Douglas county. Pending the action Timme died, and the same was revived in the name of his executors, who had a judgment, to review which Specht has filed in this court a petition in error. The note sued on was in words and figures as follows:
“1500.00. Omaha, Neb., Oct. 15, 1890.
“Six months after date we, or either of us, promise to pay to W. R. Yaughan, or order, the sum of five hundred dollars, for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- White v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Mahoney v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Palmer v. LargentNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
- Polo Manufacturing Co. v. ParrNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brock v. LuethNebraska Supreme Court · 1942