Legal Opinion

Hamlin v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 12, 1996No. 1931221, 1931292Published

1Dissent

The ultimate question presented for review here is whether the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970 (FRSA), 45 U.S.C. § 421-447, preempts these two tort claims, which arise out of accidents at two railroad crossings at which the plaintiffs claim the warning devices were inadequate or defective.4

The majority holds that the preemption doctrine does not apply. Although the doctrine of federal preemption, especially of a state tort claim, is sometimes confusing and difficult to understand, I have concluded, after carefully reviewing the law of federal preemption, especially as it relates to the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Linda Thiele, Guardian of the Person and Estate of Craig Thiele v. Norfolk & Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Hester v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Jason M. Shots v. Csx Transportation, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Singletary v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API