Arkansas River Education Service Cooperative v. Modacure
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Paul E. Danielson, Justice.
Appellant Arkansas River stice. Cooperative (“ARESC”) appeals from the circuit court’s order denying its motion for summary judgment. ARESC’s sole point on appeal is that the circuit court erred in denying its summary-judgment motion because it is entitled to immunity from liability and from suit for damages pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 21-9-301 (Repl. 2004). We reverse and remand.
A review of the record reveals that during the 2004-05 school year, Appellee Larry Modacure was a student in the Watson Chapel School District. Modacure was also enrolled in a vocational…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McMickle v. GriffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Ozarks Unlimited Resources Cooperative, Inc. v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Helena-West Helena School District v. MondaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Arkansas Diagnostic Center, P.A. v. TahiriSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
3Cited by8 opinions
- Langford v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- City of Fayetteville v. RomineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Gentry v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Trammell v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- Young v. Blytheville School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.