Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hochstetler v. Elkhart County Highway Department

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 2006No. 20A05-0602-CV-98Published

1DissentFriedlander, Judge

I would affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of Elkhart County, and therefore respectfully dissent.

The statute upon which this case must be decided states, "[a] governmental entity . is not liable if a loss results from ... [tlhe temporary condition of a public thoroughfare ... that results from weather." Ind.Code Ann. § 34-13-3-8(8) (West, PREMISE through 2006 Public Laws approved and effective through March 15, 2006). On the face of it, it would seem the facts before us fit squarely within the *737boundaries of this provision. In the early morning hours of June 12, 2001, a violent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Catt v. Board of Com'rs of Knox CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Young v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Van Bree v. Harrison CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Leinbach v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Dzierba v. City of Michigan CityIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API