Legal Opinion

Gann v. McGee

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 22, 1916No. 7302PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Trover; from municipal court of Macon—Judge Chambers. February 16, 1916.

1Opinion of the Court

Wade, O. J.

1. The homestead exemption covering a “Eord automobile” can only have been allowed under the provisions of section 3377 of the Civil Code of 1910, and could not be upheld as a statutory or “short” homestead (Civil Code of 1910, § 3416), since only the specific things named in the statute may be exempted by the latter, and an automobile is not so named. The conclusion that a homestead was sought and obtained under section 3377, supra, is further authorized by the fact that the application gave the names and addresses of the creditors of the husband of the applicant, from whose…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nichols v. HamptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  2. Beaty v. SearsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Long v. BullardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  4. Gamble v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Welsh v. Lewis & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pellish Bros. v. CooperWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  2. In re McEuenDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API