Legal Opinion

Annie Mae Brazier v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 13, 1958No. 17057PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents the question whether, in a common law action for negligence, an employee is entitled to recover from her employer damages for personal injuries sustained when she fell while returning from a refreshment stand across the street from employer’s premises, by reason of the unsafe condition of the temporary walk-way provided by outsiders who were engaged in paving the street, when the employer had “directed” the employee to take a “coffee-break” and had provided no coffee on the premises. Plaintiff (appellant) Brazier brought a civil action against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jose Estevez v. Horace A. Nabers, Acting Officer in Charge, New Orleans Office Immigration& Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Sardo v. McGrath Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  3. Mullen v. Fitz Simons & Connell Dredge & Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  4. Seminole Graphite Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. BrodaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marino v. Classic Auto Refinishing, Inc. (In Re Marino)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Annie Mae Brazier v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. Marino v. Classic Auto Refinishing, Inc. (In Re Marino)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API