Legal Opinion

Russell v. Gift

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 1929No. 13,454Published

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Action for money had and received by appellee against appellants, alleging that appellants had collected and retained $230 belonging to appellee which they had failed on demand to pay over to her. Appellants filed answer in set-off for $48.90, and a cross-complaint asking $425 as commission due them on a written contract for the sale of real estate belonging to appellee. Appellee admitted the set-off on account of money paid out by appellants for repairs, and filed to the cross-complaint an answer in three paragraphs, denial fraud and estoppel. The second paragraph avers, in substance, that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Southern Street Railway Advertising Co. v. Metropole Shoe Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  2. Lavalleur v. HahnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Bartholomew v. FellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API