Chisum v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

In its substance and legal effect, the evidence is not materially different from that before the court on the former appeal. See Chisum v. State, 50 S. W. (2d) 321.

In the present instance, the bills of exception fail to comply with the essential requisites. They are particularly wanting in complying with the rule stated in Texas Jur., vol. 4, sec. 206, as follows: “The truth of the objections must be verified by the bill, that is, the bill must show that the objections stated are founded in fact and that the grounds of objection are true, and…