Legal Opinion
United States v. Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 12, 2005No. 04-4166, 04-4167PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this court has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant-appellant Deon Raymond Martinez pleaded guilty to ten counts of bank robbery, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). At sentencing, the district court departed upward from the sentencing range recommended in the presen-tence investigation report (“PSR”) and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Gonzalez-HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Labastida-SeguraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. PettigrewCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Cleo PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. ZunieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.