Legal Opinion
Chrysler Corporation v. Texas Motor Vehicle Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 28, 1985No. 84-1651PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
We review for constitutional sufficiency Texas’ effort to encourage extrajudicial resolution of warranty-related disputes between the purchasers of new vehicles and automobile manufacturers. Chrysler Corporation persuaded the district court that Texas’ “lemon law,” which grants automobile purchasers certain additional administrative remedies against manufacturers, is unconstitutional. The district court held that the statute denies manufacturers due process because automobile dealers, whose interests are said to conflict with those of manufacturers,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Gentek Building Products, Inc., Steel Peel Litigation Trust, Formerly Known as Sherwin-Williams Claims Trust v. The Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Richard Lucas v. United States of America, Richard Lucas, Cross-Appellees v. United States of America, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Leonard Levitt v. The University of Texas at El Paso and Haskell Monroe, Individually and as Representative of UtepCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Michael McMonagle v. Northeast Women's Center, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Morrow v. HarwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.