Legal Opinion

EMANUEL v. COMMISSIONER

United States Tax Court

Decided October 3, 2002No. 10609-00S; No. 13639-01SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT AND MARTHA EMANUEL, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

EMANUEL v. COMMISSIONER

No. 10609-00S; No. 13639-01S

United States Tax Court

T.C. Summary Opinion 2002-127; 2002 Tax Ct. Summary LEXIS 127;

October 3, 2002, Filed

PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b), THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.

Larry C. Fedro and Cara Pavalock (specially recognized), for petitioners.

Timothy Maher, for respondent.

Panuthos, Peter J.

Panuthos, Peter J.

PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge: These cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Rowan Cos. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Fischer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  4. Seed v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  5. Jacobs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API