Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Connare

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided April 10, 1996No. CV-95-168-BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Hoyt v. Connare CV-95-168-B 04/10/96 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Karl B. Hovt v. Civil No. 95-168-B David Connare, et al. O R D E R Currently for the court's consideration is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (document no. 12). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND On March 29, 1995 plaintiff, Karl Hoyt, filed an action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

alleging violations of his constitutional rights by defendants David Connare (police officer for the Manchester Police Department), Marc Desilets (police…

2Cases cited17 opinions

Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
Thomasina Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
Wm. T. Thompson Co. v. General Nutrition Corp., Inc. General Nutrition Corporation and General Nutrition Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
Nestle Foods Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
Greater Newburyport Clamshell Alliance v. Public Service Company of New Hampshire, Appeal of Jan SchlichtmannCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.