United States v. Raiche
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtLuse, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
In my opinion, the paper which purports to be a contract between Saw-bad-deese-once-ish and David Blackbird must be rejected as written evidence of a transaction of sale and purchase, first, because its age is insufficient to warrant its acceptance under the ancient document rule; second, because there was no evidence proving the signatures upon the paper; and, third, because the circumstances of its production are as consistent with nondelivery to Blackbird as with delivery. It is quite clear, also, that there has never been approval of sale of the 6 acres…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pickering v. LomaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lykins v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Schrimpscher v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Lomax v. PickeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schaghticoke Tribe of Indians v. Kent School Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
- In Re Bailey's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- United States v. Charles J. Schwarz, and Fremont C. WollerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972