Legal Opinion

British Empire Ins. v. Hasenmayer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1919PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Multnomah: John P. Kavanaugh, Judge. Department 2. Action by the British Empire Insurance Company, a corporation, against Ernest Hasenmayer. Judgment for plaintiff for $1 set aside on plaintiff’s motion and new trial granted. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

The plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Dominion of Canada. It is alleged in the complaint that on July 11,1912, the plaintiff sold to the defendant ten shares of its- capital stock for which the defendant agreed to pay $100 per share ‘‘upon calls to be made from time to time by plaintiff according to the laws, by-laws and regulations governing the same.” It is further averred that on June 20, 1913, the defendant purchased an additional share of stock and agreed to pay $100 for it upon calls to be *609made from time to time. The…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Stetson v. StindtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
  3. Williams v. Clemen's Forest Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. James Turner & Sons v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Tou Velle v. Farm Bureau Co-op. ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API