Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 1990No. Civ. A. 90-63PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHILL, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff William J. Stokes filed this action pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3), seeking review of the final decision of defendant Secretary of Health and Human Services denying him Supplemental Security Income. Presently .before the Court are plaintiff’s and defendant’s cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we will grant plaintiffs motion and deny defendant’s motion.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff William J. Stokes filed his first application for Social Security Income on March 10, 1987, alleging…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. ALLEN, William H., Appellant, v. BOWEN, Otis, R., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SHELLINGTON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API