Legal Opinion
Perutz v. Bohemian Discount Bank in Liquidation
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 9, 1953PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Loughban, Ch. J.
At the times and on the occasions to which we shall refer, the defendant was a banking corporation organized and existing under the laws of Czechoslovakia with a place of business at Prague. In 1940, it acquired all the assets and assumed all the liabilities of the Bank of Commerce and Industry, another Czechoslovakian banking corporation.
Arthur Perutz was an employee of the Bank of Commerce and Industry from July 1, 1905 to January 31, 1940; he was then a citizen of Czechoslovakia and so remained until March 4, 1946, when he became a naturalized citizen of the United States;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- M. Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Holzer v. Deutsche Reichsbahn-GesellschaftNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Meyers v. Credit LyonnaisNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Libra Bank Ltd. v. Banco Nacional De Costa Rica, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Banco Frances E Brasileiro S. A. v. DoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Banco Do Brasil, S. A. v. A. C. Israel Commodity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Federal Republic of Germany v. ElicofonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
- Perutz v. BOHEMIAN DISC. BANK IN LIQUIDATIONNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.