Legal Opinion

United States v. Palan

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided February 18, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, District Judge.

This is a motion in arrest of judgment. Defendants have been indicted and convicted of a violation of section 3 of the immigration act of 1907 (Act Feb.-20, 1907, c. 1134, 34 Stat. 899 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 392]). The material portion of that section is as follows:

“That the importation into the United States of any alien woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution, or for any other immoral purpose, is hereby forbidden; and whoever shall, directly or indirectly, import, or attempt to import, into the United States, any alien woman or girl for the purpose of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grafton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Fox v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  4. United States v. MarigoldSupreme Court of the United States · 1850

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. GravesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  3. State v. WestSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Cooley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. United States ex rel. Dickman v. WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API