Legal Opinion
Matter of Wilheim
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 12, 1983No. 19-11899PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
D. JOSEPH DE VITO, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter concerns objections to confirmation of the Chapter 13 plan of arrangement proposed by joint debtors, Antal and Juliana Wilheim, the first of which, raised by a group of unsecured judicial lien creditors, asserts that the debtors’ plan fails the “best interest of creditors” test contained in 11 U.S.C. § 1325[a][4], requiring the present value of total payments to an unsecured creditor included in a Chapter 13 plan to equal not less than that which would be received if the debtor’s estate were liquidated under Chapter 7. See Ravenot v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Ronald Estus and Doris Estus, Debtors. United States of America v. Ronald EstusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Margaret Ann Deans v. Gerald O'donnell, Trustee, in Re Margaret Ann DeansCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- In Re RimgaleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- In Re TauscherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matter of BarthUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
- In Re DixonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- In Re HiebUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1988
- In re OchsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- In re TrombettaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.