Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Armstrong

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHooley, J.

Plaintiff moves to vacate the interlocutory judgment of divorce heretofore granted to the plaintiff on July 26, 1940, and permit the service of an amended complaint, praying for a separation. Defendant opposes the motion.

The motion is not based upon a possibility of reconciliation but rather upon the suspicion, on the part of the plaintiff, that defendant will marry the corespondent and that her son will be, from time to time, in company with his father and so in the company of the corespondent. Plaintiff also claims that she was improperly advised by her previous attorneys, that she never…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kenner v. KennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Levey v. LeveyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  3. McVickar v. McVickarNew York Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. ZuckermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Deschamps v. DeschampsNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Burgher v. BurgherNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Turek v. TurekNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Doe v. DoeNew York Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API