Legal Opinion

Louis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 31, 1995No. 94-2056PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We find no merit to most of the appellant’s points on appeal and therefore affirm the convictions and sentences below with but two exceptions. First, the judgment form must be corrected to reflect that burglary of a structure is a third degree felony. Second, the amount ordered in restitution is improperly supported only by hearsay evidence of value. See Delks v. State, 622 So.2d 624 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); House v. State, 614 So.2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Thomas v. State, 581 So.2d 992 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Hence, that portion of the restitution order is vacated and the cause remanded for a new…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Delks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. House v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. J.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  5. JL v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API