Legal Opinion

State ex rel. City of Creve Coeur v. Weinstein

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1959No. 30255PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDDY, Judge.

The case before us is an original proceeding wherein relators in their petition for prohibition pray for an order and writ of this court prohibiting respondent, Hon. Noah Weinstein, a Judge of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, from hearing and considering the allegations and the evidence thereon of the cross-claim and *401counterclaim filed in a condemnation action. The counterclaim and cross-claim was filed by defendants, Howard P. Venable and Katie Venable. Constitutional questions are directly raised in the counterclaim and cross-claim. Where constitutional questions are…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Cooper v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blaske v. Smith & Entzeroth, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. Houser v. GoodmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Corcoran v. BuderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. United States v. Huet-VaughnU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  5. Blaske v. Smith & Entzeroth, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API