Legal Opinion

Sarah J. Harris and Bradley C. Harris v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 10, 2017No. CASE NO. 1D15-2022PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In granting final judgment on U.S. Bank National’s foreclosure complaint against Sarah and Bradley Harris (whom we’ll call “the Borrowers”), the trial court held that a HUD regulation was a condition precedent to foreclosure, but that the Borrowers failed to raise the issue and timely challenge the Bank’s noncompliance with the regulation. We affirm.

I

The Bank sought to foreclose a mortgage secured by a promissory note issued to the Borrowers. As an FHA loan, the note contained the following provision:

If Borrower defaults by failing to pay in full any monthly payment, then Lender may, except…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Custer Medical Center v. United Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. Cross v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Bank of America, National Ass'n v. AsburyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  4. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. QuinionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. Gunderson v. School Dist. of HillsboroughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. RICHARD DEROUIN & KIM DEROUIN v. UNIVERSAL AMERICAN MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Chrzuszcz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC v. SANTIA LASHAWN WALCOTT-BARR and MARK LIVINGSTON BARRDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  4. Pike Holdings, LLC v. Brighthouse Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API