Legal Opinion

Boston National Bank v. Jose

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1894No. 1219PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

This action was brought by appellant against S. D. Gustin, George W. Tibbetts, Thomas Jose and Alonzo Jose, partners, under the firm name of Jose & Son, to recover the balance due on a promissory note for $2,500, *186executed and delivered by said defendants to appellant on November 23, 1890.

The complaint alleged the execution of the note, and that no part thereof had been paid except the sum of $1000 on account of principal, and certain other sums as interest, paid thereon at dates specified therein, and demanded judgment against the defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Muldon v. WhitlockNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  2. Blunt v. WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Tobey v. EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. Brown v. OlmstedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Morse v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1868

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  2. First National Bank v. Cottonwood Land Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Griffin Wellpoint Corp. v. Engelhardt, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. McAllister v. Pier 67, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Pacific Southwest Trust & Savings Bank v. MayerWashington Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API