Legal Opinion

Howell v. Teel

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bill for relief. Motion to dissolve injunction on bill and answer.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The complainants, assignees under an assignment made to them by James M. Andrews under the act “to secure to *491creditors an equal and just division of the estates of debtors who convey to assignees for the benefit of creditors,” by their hill seek to restrain the defendant Teel from executing upon the real property which passed to them by the assignment, a judgment recovered by him against their assignor and John C. Bennett, in the circuit court of Warren county, previously to the assignment.

There is no ground, however, for applying the distinction between the rules at law and in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. M'Dermutt v. StrongNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
  2. Meech v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. R. W. Smith & Co. v. Mallory's Ex'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  4. Hosack v. RogersNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
  5. In re BigelowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1869

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. ScurrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  2. West Hudson County Trust Co. v. WichnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API