Legal Opinion

Trescott v. Barnes

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 12, 1879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Clayton Circuit Court. ■ Action on promissory notes. The defendant pleaded an equitable defense. A judgment for plaintiff was had upon-a trial to the court. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Beck, Ch. J.

1 pormer aajudgmental appeal. — The answer sets up, as a defense, that the notes in suit were given in the purchase of a town lot, which plaintiff became bound to convey to defendant by clee<l warranty. It is not necessary to recite transactions under which the parties acquired an interest in the lot. The answer shows that an incumbrance in the nature of an easement for a drain held by another party rests upon the lot, and that the value of the property is greatly diminished thereby, and it is rendered unfit for the purposes for which it was purchased. It is also alleged that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trescott v. BarnesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Braden v. KrugIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Town of Fulton v. PomeroyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Dallas v. DallasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. Holderman v. HoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Telegraph v. LeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API