Legal Opinion

Farago v. Krzyske

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1927No. Docket No. 12Published

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiff owned a farm of 60 acres in Sumpter township, Wayne county. There was a mortgage on it for $4,500 held by defendant Ludwig Krzyske. There was $70 interest due on the mortgage. Krzyske foreclosed the mortgage by advertisement and bid in the premises for $126.35 at the sheriff’s sale on November 3, 1924. On March 6, 1925, he transferred the mortgage and his interest in the premises to defendant Felt. May 23, 1925, plaintiff paid Felt $170 and was given a receipt for this sum “to apply on interest of mortgage.” It does not appear that it was applied by either party on the interest due…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mauro v. DavieMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Van Sceiver v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. McMullen MacHinery Co. v. Grand Rapids Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API