Legal Opinion

Bristow v. Taul

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 25, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Sims

Affirming.

This, action was brought by Mrs. Elizabeth Taul Bristow against her stepmother, Mrs. Elizabeth Taul, and involves the identity and ownership of a diamond ring. The law and the facts were submitted to the court, without the intervention of a jury, who found for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

The petition avers plaintiff owns a one-half carat diamond ring which defendant had in her possession and was wrongfully withholding from plaintiff. Recovery of the ring' was sought and if it could not be produced, plaintiff asked judgment for $400, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Slack v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  2. Roberts v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Lindon v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lowney v. KnottSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1956
  2. McHargue v. ConradCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
  3. Lindsey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API