Legal Opinion

Forrest v. . Havens

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1868PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bacon, -J.

Upon the trial of this cause, the only available exception taken by the defendant’s counsel was to the refusal of the judge to charge as requested, that the plaintiff could only recover nominal damages, for the reason that it appeared that the suit in which the undertaking of these defendants was given was a suit for a divorce prosecuted in the Superior Court, which had no jurisdiction to grant a divorce, and the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction of the action in which the divorce was granted, and the undertaking was therefore void.

Upon the argument here, this exception is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Forrest v. . ForrestNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Rockwell v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Bates v. MerrickNew York Supreme Court · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API