Legal Opinion

Albert v. Brownell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1954No. 13651PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff filed a complaint in which she set up that she is unmarried and not an “enemy” or “ally of enemy” within the meaning of Section 2 of the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended. 1 She claims an “interest, right, or title” in certain property seized by the Alien Property Custodian and prays recovery thereof. She alleges in her first cause of action that on August 28, 1942, when by executive order such properties were vested in United States officials, she was the owner of certain shares of common stock of Resinous Products & Chemical Company, an American…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Jackson Ex Rel. United States v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Klamath & Moadoc Tribes of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roy B. Foster v. Thomas J. MacBrideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Peddicord v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Nuove Industrie Elettriche Di Legnano S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
  4. Von Clemm v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  5. Jew May Lune, by Guardian Ad Litem Jew Doo Lee v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API