Legal Opinion

Rathbone v. Corse

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 22, 2015No. 14-104PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1.

Reiber, C.J.

This case comes to us as an appeal from a family court judge’s review of a magistrate’s order that required *366mother to reimburse father for an overpayment of his child-support obligations. In a September 2013 order that disposed of father’s motion to modify his child-support obligation, the magistrate found that father paid child support while mother also received a social security disability insurance (SSDI) derivative benefit on behalf of the parties’ child through father’s own SSDI benefit. The magistrate cited our decision in Louko v. McDonald for the proposition that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. N.A.S. Holdings, Inc. v. PafundiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Weaks v. WeaksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. LaMothe v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  5. LOUKO v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Marriage of Stephenson & PapineauSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. Rathbone v. CorseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. Mark A. Rosenbaum v. Pamela ShawAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. LaMothe v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. Y.H. v. M.H., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API