Golden Eagle Western Lines, Inc. v. Bingaman
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Dissent
BRATTON, Circuit Judge (dissenting).
The crucial question presented for determination is whether the tax involved represents a reasonable and nondiscriminatory excise upon the privilege of using the public highways of New Mexico in the conduct of an interstate motprbus business or a levy upon the prerogative to engage in interstate commerce. If the former, it is valid; if the latter, it violates the Commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States (article 1, § 8, cl. 3) and must fall.
A sketchy chronology of the legislation in New Mexico may be helpful. Chapter 93, Laws of 1919,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Clark v. PoorSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Interstate Busses Corp. v. BlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Helson & Randolph v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Interstate Transit, Inc. v. LindseySupreme Court of the United States · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.