Legal Opinion · Dissent

Golden Eagle Western Lines, Inc. v. Bingaman

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided July 19, 1935No. 2765Published

1Dissent

BRATTON, Circuit Judge (dissenting).

The crucial question presented for determination is whether the tax involved represents a reasonable and nondiscriminatory excise upon the privilege of using the public highways of New Mexico in the conduct of an interstate motprbus business or a levy upon the prerogative to engage in interstate commerce. If the former, it is valid; if the latter, it violates the Commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States (article 1, § 8, cl. 3) and must fall.

A sketchy chronology of the legislation in New Mexico may be helpful. Chapter 93, Laws of 1919,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Clark v. PoorSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Interstate Busses Corp. v. BlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Helson & Randolph v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Interstate Transit, Inc. v. LindseySupreme Court of the United States · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API