Legal Opinion

Stone Key v. Monster

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 11, 2019No. 18-2804Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-2804 Stone Key v. Monster UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Krumme v. WestPoint Stevens Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Diesel Props S.R.L. v. Greystone Business Credit II LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. Spinelli v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  4. Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. Merck Eprova AG v. Gnosis S.P.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API