Legal Opinion
People v. Middleton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 30, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered March 10, 2004, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the People did not present *942legally sufficient evidence to establish his guilt is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. CortijoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. DorceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. BessardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. DelamotaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Stephen O.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Matter of Woods v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017