Legal Opinion

Picadura v. Humphrey

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 9, 1960No. 47478PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COIL, Commissioner.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a decree for defendants in her suit to set aside a 1936 judgment on the ground of fraud in its procurement and to revest title in her as a contingent remainderman of an undivided one-half interest in 400 acres of land. Title is directly involved and thus this court has appellate jurisdiction. While all the defendants below are shown as respondents in the caption above, only respondents Walter A. Humphrey and his wife have filed a brief.

Wade H. Humphrey (sometimes called “Humphreys” in deeds and other instruments in evidence) owned, among…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Hughes v. NeelySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Fadler v. GabbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Mattingly v. WashburnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ragan v. LooneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. State Ex Rel. Seals v. McGuireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. McMahon v. May Department Stores CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. V_ D. S v. W_ E. SMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Bernstein v. BernsteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API