Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claim of Struzycki v. R. W. Smith Contracting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1921Published

Award affirmed.

1Dissent

Kiley, J. (dissenting):

The accident in this ease occurred on the 7th day of May, 1918. At that time the claimant was required, by section 18 *946of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, to give written notice of the accident and injury to his employer within ten days. On May' 13, 1918, and before claimant had given such written notice to his employer, section 18, supra, was amended, extending the time to give notice to thirty days, and permitting the Commission ,o excuse default of the written notice, where “ notice for some sufficient reason could not have been given, or on the ground that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Quinlan v. . WelchNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. G. W. Ry. Co. v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Kelly v. MulcahyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. Claim of Moran v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API