Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bachtel v. Miller County Nursing Home District

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 29, 2003No. SC 84835Published

1Dissent

STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR., Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent.

At the outset, I question the majority’s reliance on Clark v. Beverly Enterprises-Missouri, Inc., 872 S.W.2d 522, 525 (Mo. App.1994), for the proposition that section 198.070.10 of the Omnibus Nursing Home Act (ONHA) implicitly creates a private cause of action for nursing home employees terminated in violation of the statute. The Clark court failed to account for section 198.067 of the ONHA, which autho*806rizes the Department of Social Services, or the Attorney General on the Department’s behalf, to bring an action in circuit…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kanagawa v. State by and Through FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Bartley v. Special School District of St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Richardson v. State Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Community Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. Kleban v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API