Legal Opinion

Bao Shilu v. Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center, et al.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 3, 2026No. 3:26-cv-01275Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 BAO SHILU, Case No.: 3:26-cv-01275-RBM-BJW 10 Petitioner, ORDER: 11 v. (1) GRANTING PETITION FOR 12 WARDEN, Otay Mesa Detention Center, WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS et al., 13 UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2241; Respondents. 14 (2) DENYING MOTION FOR 15 INTERPRETER AS MOOT 16 17 18 Pending before the Court are Petitioner Bao Shilu’s (“Petitioner”) Petition for Writ 19 of Habeas Corpus Under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(“Petition”) (Doc. 1) and Motion for 20 Appointment of Interpreter (Doc. 6). For the reasons set forth below, the Petition is 21…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Ortega-Cervantes v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Williams v. County of AlamedaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API