O'Brien v. Camden
West Virginia Supreme Court
This case was brought up from Lewis county. The summons served upon Johnson N. Camden, the defendant, was returnable to the 1st day of March term, 1867, of the circuit court of that county. The following is the order from which appeal was made: “ O’Brien, Grafflin and Hanson vs. Johnson N. Camden.
Read the full summary
This case was brought up from Lewis county. The summons served upon Johnson N. Camden, the defendant, was returnable to the 1st day of March term, 1867, of the circuit court of that county. The following is the order from which appeal was made: “ O’Brien, Grafflin and Hanson vs. Johnson N. Camden. VlTpon a Suggestion. j This day came the plaintiffs, by their attorney, and the court having maturely considered the motion made on the 5th day of the March term last, of this court, to grant them a rule against Johnson N. Camden, to compel him to appear and answer the plaintiffs’ suggestion, filed…
1Opinion of the Court
Brown, President.
The defendant Camden was summoned to appear on the 1st day of the circuit court of Lewis county and answer a suggestion under section 11, chapter 188, Code 1860.
The plaintiff making the suggestion moved for a rule under section Í3 of same chapter, upon the defendant Camden, to compel him to appear and answer, but the court overruled the motion and refused the rule upon the ground that the suggestion had not been docketed, nor had the summons on the suggestion been brought to the attention of the court on the day to which it was returnable, by reason whereof the same, in the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CampbellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
- Taylor v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- Gas Co. v. WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1873
- Perkins v. Southern Coal Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1951
- Perkins v. Southern Coal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.