Legal Opinion

I. Tanenbaum Son & Co. v. Brooklyn Furniture Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

Plaintiff's motion under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for summary judgment was denied. The action is for $17,000 liquidated damages for breach of the written contract annexed to the complaint.

In prior actions the validity of this form of contract has been sustained. (Tanenbaum, Son & Co. v. Rothenberg & Co., 201 App. Div. 272; affd., 236 N. Y. 520; Tanenbaum v. Federal Match Co., 189 id. 75.)

The only issues which defendant maintains require a trial are, whether the defendant executed the agreement; whether there has been due performance by plaintiff; and, finally, the affirmative…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. I. Tanenbaum, Son & Co. v. Rothenberg & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. I. Tanenbaum, Son Co. v. . Rothenberg Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API