Legal Opinion
City Title Insurance v. Orgel
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoss, J.
This is an application under the provisions of article 78 of the Civil Practice Act by City Title Insurance Company and the Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn, as petitioners, for an order of review against respondent, Lewis Orgel, register of the City of New York. An issue is raised as to the amount of mortgage tax due under a certain instrument entitled ‘1 Additional Advance Agreement ’ Originally the City Title Insurance Company was the sole petitioner but later the court allowed the Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn to intervene as a petitioner and an order to that effect was duly entered.
The “…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kovarsky v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Matter of Towers Man. Corp. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Champney v. . CoopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Matter of Park 46th St. Corp. v. State Tax Comm.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Hollis v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carey v. SavinoNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Fifth Avenue & 46th Street Corp. v. BragaliniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Feinbart Realty Corp. v. HermanNew York Supreme Court · 1962