Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mallans

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1913No. Appeal, No. 289Published

Appeal, No. 289, Jan. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Schuylkill Co., July T., 1912, No. 62, in favor of relator, on suggestion and answer in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ex rel. Thomas. Wood v. George Malians. Before Fell, C. J., Quo warranto to try title to office. Before Bechtel, P. J. Error assigned was in entering judgment for tbe relator.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Tbe question involved in tbis appeal is wbetber under tbe schedule for tbe amendment of tbe Constitution adopted in 1909, tbe term of office of an assessor elected at tbe February election in 1910 ended on tbe first Monday of December, 1911, or was extended until tbe first Monday of December, 1913. Since tbe judgment appealed from was entered in tbe Common Pleas, tbe same question was considered by tbis court in Commonwealth v. Samuel, 238 Pa. 155, and it-was decided that tbe term was not extended.

The judgment is reversed at tbe cost of tbe appellee.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. SamuelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913