Legal Opinion

Hink v. Mehlhorn

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1933No. 24514. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to foreclose a real estate mortgage. The defendant Else Mehlhorn answered, and, by cross-complaint, pleaded a prior mortgage and alleged that it was superior in right. With the other defendants, we are not here concerned, and no mention will be made of them. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment foreclosing the plaintiff’s mortgage, but adjudging that it was subordinate to that of the defendant named. From this judgment, the plaintiff appeals.

The facts which will present the questions to be determined may be summarized as follows:…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McLaren v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Liska v. BeckmannWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Corbet v. WallerWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Wees v. PageWashington Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Maud L. ElferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Nichols v. McDougalWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Von Normann v. WoodsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Port Orchard Airport, Inc. v. Shannon WagnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API