Legal Opinion

Compagnia Di Navigazione Mauritius Rome v. Kulukundis

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 13, 1954No. 20067PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

This is a libellant’s motion to vacate a respondent’s notice of taking the deposition “of the libelant by the Master of the M/S Malmohus or any other officer whom it is able to produce, who has knowledge of the facts, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [28 U.S.C.A.] (as provided in Admiralty Rule 32 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York) * * * ”

The action is for demurrage against the charterer, and the cargo-owner who gave the above notice; there are sub-charterers who have been impleaded by the former.

*677The libellant is an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fruit Growers Co-Op. v. California Pie & Baking Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Supine v. Compagnie Nationale Air FranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API