Legal Opinion

Curran v. Nakelski

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLloyd I. Herzka, J.

In an action for a declaratory judgment, plaintiff moves to strike defendants’ answer and counterclaim for summary judgment. The action arises out of a policy of life insurance issued to one Thomas Curran by the Prudential Insurance Company of America, in which plaintiff herein is *104designated as the beneficiary. The policy was issued on June 25, 1956 and on July 5, 1956 the assured died as the result of an accident. Plaintiff has filed a proof of loss under the terms of the policy and now claims the proceeds thereof. Defendants Nakelski also made claim upon the proceeds. The latters’ claim is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schoenholz v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Greenfield v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. In re the Estate of O'NeillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  4. Craig v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York Life Insurance v. AgeeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API