Legal Opinion

Yorfino v. Ferguson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 25, 1977No. 6618PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OSBORN, Justice.

Under the Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, the appellee recovered judgment against Joseph R. Yorfi-no, Jr., and Grady Haddox in connection with a work proposal submitted by Belco Contractors & Services. It was alleged that Yorfino and Haddox were partners in the Belco contracting firm, which performed work at Appellant’s home. Based upon jury findings that Yorfino committed certain deceptive trade practices resulting in $1,500.00 damages, judgment was entered for three times that amount, plus attorney’s fees as found by the jury. See Tex.Bus. &…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Quinn v. PressTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Press v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. A. J. Rife Construction Co. v. BransCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Goldberg v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Barcheers v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. StoolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Garcia v. American Physicians Insurance Exchange, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  3. Carlyle Joint Venture v. H.B. Zachry Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
  4. Liquid Energy Corp. v. Trans-Pan Gathering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Garcia v. American Physicians Insurance Exchange, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API