Legal Opinion

Watzek v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 11, 1955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMIERI, District Judge.

The Government makes this motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The facts are undisputed. Plaintiff’s assignor posted a bond on behalf of an alien, one Adamek. The bond was for $500. This sum was to be returned to the obligor “if the said alien is admitted temporarily as a visitor for business or pleasure (or is granted an extension of the period of his admission for such purpose or purposes), and if the said alien shall in all respects comply with the conditions of his admission (or of the extension of the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stanley G. Earle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. Kazi S. Ahmed v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. TOSCANO-RIVASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1973
  4. NGUYENBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975
  5. Earle v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API