Legal Opinion
Darryl Maurice Young v. San Francisco Housing Authority, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 19, 2026No. 3:26-cv-02860Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DARRYL MAURICE YOUNG, Case No. 26-cv-02860-TSH 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 v. PROVIDE SERVICE INSTRUCTIONS AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO 10 SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING PROVIDE SERVICE ADDRESS AUTHORITY, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 On April 3, 2026, the Court granted Plaintiff Darryl Maurice Young’s application to 14 proceed in forma pauperis, screened his original complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and 15 directed service on Defendant San Francisco Housing Authority. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff 16 subsequently filed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Pliler v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Andrew John Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. George W. Sumner, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Brown v. Wachovia BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007