Legal Opinion

Succession of Hanna

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 19, 1914No. 19722PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; George H. Théard, Judge. Succession of John H. Hanna. From a judgment rejecting the claim of E. A. O’Sullivan for a further fee, he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, C. J.

E. A. O’Sullivan, a member of the bar, prosecutes this appeal from a judgment which holds that a fee of $5,259.-12, which has been paid him for services rendered in behalf of the minor Cleo Hanna, “is all that he is entitled to, under the law and the evidence,” and rejects his claim for a further amount of $5,889.83.

It appears from the evidence that Mr. O’Sullivan was, for many years, the legal and confidential adviser of John H. Hanna, the decedent, in whose succession this litigation has been carried on; that Hanna’s wife had preceded him to the grave;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keel v. SutherlinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  2. Stewart v. CrumpSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  3. Urquhart v. ScottSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1856
  4. McWilliams v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
  5. Woodbridge v. PopeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1870

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Husk v. BlancandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Garden Hill Land Corp. v. Succession of CambreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API