Legal Opinion

Ardente v. Brunswick Corp.

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided November 5, 2014No. C.A. No. 14-258 SPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge.

Defendant Brunswick Corporation (“Defendant”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff Evan Ardente’s (“Plaintiff’) Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (See Def.’s Mot. Dismiss (“Def.’s Mot.”), ECF No. 10.) Defendant argues that admiralty law applies and precludes Plaintiffs claims. For the reasons that follow, the motion is DENIED.

I. Background1

In 1999, Plaintiff purchased a 1997 580 Super Sun Sport Sea Ray yacht (“yacht”) from its original owner. In November of 2009, Plaintiff discovered that the yacht had sustained water…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Schatz v. Republican State Leadership CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  3. Sisson v. RubySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Margaret Austin, Etc. v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  5. Thomas Carey v. Bahama Cruise LinesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API